Wednesday 23 May 2012

Ken Robinson's task on creativity

Ken Robinson's task on creativity

First of all, it is really a very interesting topic because; here, in our university, we have to deal with creativity every day. That is, if we are not creative, we will definitely lead our lives to boredom. I agree with Ken Robinson on the fact that today’s educational system has killed our talent and creativity. They shaped us in such a way that when people come to university, they are focused only in one way. According to Ken Robinson, nowadays students have been educated in such a way to become good workers, rather than a creative thinker that is far from being cultivated for their energy and curiosity he says: “we are educating people out of their creativity”. As you can see, it is totally true. It can be seen that is a message with deep resonance. 

As it was written in the begging of this subject, computers make people lazy. It is totally true. University students nowadays do not spend too much time in doing a task. It is good but now they postpone too much. They leave the task to do in the last minute of the due date. For example, in my EFL126 class, I have to admit that leave some of the tasks for the last minute of the due date because I know that if I go to my computer and connect to the internet; there are sites that will do the tasks for me. I will not open my mind and I will not be focused in those tasks. Meaning that, most of the things I will not learn. It is good because I will save a lot of time, but I will not learn properly. I will not give my best, that’s what I can say. 

I think I was more creative when I was in high school rather than now as university student because in high school, although I had lots of subjects to study, they diverged in a way that it was funny and good to study. We could think in different to things to do only one task. High school students have options. They can think on different careers, things that they want to do at the moment. Now, as university student, I became focused in only one thing. At the moment we choose what we want to do, we abdicate of most of other things we also wanted to do. For example, I did not want only to be a petroleum engineer; I wanted to be also a doctor or an environmentalist. But now, I am so focused on being a petroleum engineer that I forgot my old dreams unfortunately.

My friends' blogathon that I commented

Dilsemi
Erkan
Oscakir
Ozlem

Sunday 13 May 2012

Hi guys, here is the video.

Blogathon- Young juvenile tried as adults

Should juvenile be tried as adults?
I found this topic really interesting and I want to know what are you opinion about this subject.
I posted also a video so that you can have some more idea and to shape your opinion.


DAVID ANDERSON NOVEMBER 16, 2001


Should young criminals be tried as adults criminals? 
For nearly a century, childhood has been a mitigating condition in the eyes of the criminal law. Now that legislators want to try more children as adults, we need to be careful about throwing the baby out with the jail key.


While America's latest crime wave appears to be subsiding, the legitimate fears it aroused in urban America leave a powerful political legacy. Along with new police strategies and more prisons, legislators continue to call for harsher treatment of juvenile offenders long granted special status because of a historic belief in the diminished culpability of children and adolescents.


Nearly all states now permit the "waiver" of youngsters charged with serious crimes to adult courts; in more than half, legislatures have specifically excluded those charged with certain crimes from juvenile court jurisdiction. In some cases the exclusions apply to children as young as 13. Legislation moving forward in the current Congress would expand adult federal court jurisdiction over offenders as young as 14 and give prosecutors, rather than judges, the power to transfer a juvenile case to adult court.


It formally recognized that childhood should exist in the eyes of the criminal law. Youth, Progressives believed, can partly excuse even violent misbehavior and always permits hope for rehabilitation. Is that historic commitment really obsolete?


The question remains germane even as juvenile crime trend lines turn down, because demographics suggest a possible new crime wave. Scholars like James Alan Fox of Northeastern University have predicted a "baby-boomerang" 20 percent increase in the juvenile population and juvenile crime by 2005. The Justice
Department predicts a doubling of juvenile arrests for violent crime by 2010. The Senate Judiciary Committee report on the new juvenile crime bill relies heavily on such predictions to justify treating more juvenile offenders as adults. Defenders of special treatment find themselves hampered by the history of the juvenile court, whose usefulness has fallen into real question as it has succumbed to an advanced identity crisis.


Today's juvenile courts continue the practice of dealing with cases of child abuse and neglect, along with "status offenses"—truancy, running away from home, unmanageability—as well as juvenile delinquency. A 1994 survey counted 1.9 million juvenile court filings (an increase of 59 percent since 1984); about two-thirds were for juvenile delinquency.


Through the 1970s and early 1980s, responding to pressure from a crime-weary public, legislatures began pushing for punishment rather than treatment, especially of youngsters who looked like "hard-core" juvenile career criminals. They required juvenile courts to impose determinate or mandatory minimum sentences based on the severity of the crime rather than the needs of the offender. Some juvenile courts adopted the more punitive approach without any prodding from a legislature.


Juveniles sentenced to confinement, meanwhile, all too often wound up in training schools or detention centers that mocked the historic commitment to therapy, education, and rehabilitation. Inquiries and lawsuits during the 1970s and 1980s found juvenile inmates regularly subjected to systematic humiliation, solitary confinement in squalid cells, beatings, and homosexual assaults.


All this occurred in the face of evidence that more constructive approaches could work. In the early 1970s, the Massachusetts Department of Youth Services, led by Jerome Miller, closed most of its training schools, reserving only a few institutions for the worst offenders. The rest went to residential community-based programs or home to their families while the state contracted with private agencies for appropriate social services. An evaluation 15 years after the training school closings found that half of 875 youngsters released from DYS programs were rearrested within three years; during that time, 24 percent wound up recommitted to DYS or incarcerated in adult prisons. That compared favorably with other states. In California, for example, 70 percent of youngsters released from reform schools were rearrested within only one year, and 60 percent were reincarcerated three years after release. To this day, Massachusetts remains the leading example of how reform might help. 


States also encouraged the shift of more juvenile cases to adult courts by either lowering the age of adult court jurisdiction for crimes or giving judges or prosecutors discretion to order waivers. The trend continued despite research demonstrating that such measures were having less than the desired effect. Adult courts are typically far more lenient with property offenders than are juvenile courts. And in states where judges supervised transfer of juvenile cases to adult courts, they tended to send up many more burglary and larceny cases than robberies, rapes, and murders. 


The property offenders therefore benefited from the "punishment gap," getting off with a year or two of lightly supervised probation, the routine in adult court, when the juvenile judge might have ordered them into a youth prison.


The majority of young people who break the law are not feral, pre-social predators. Though juvenile violence increased at a shocking rate during the late 1980s, the more than 2,000 homicides reported each year remain a tiny percentage of all juvenile crime. Of the 1.4 million arrests referred to juvenile courts in 1992, 57 percent involved property offenses as the most serious charge, while 21 percent involved crimes against the person. There is real danger that legislative nets cast to capture the "superpredators" will sweep in thousands of lesser fry as well, at appalling social and financial cost.


Furthermore, whatever goals the move against special treatment might accomplish, greater public safety does not appear to be one of them. A Florida study published in 1996 matched 2,738 juvenile delinquents transferred to adult courts with a control group that remained in the juvenile system. "By every measure of recidivism employed, reoffending was greater among transfers than among the matched controls," the researchers stated.


Beyond programs designed to deal with youngsters after arrest, students of juvenile crime remain fascinated with the idea of intervening in the lives of children and teenagers "at risk" of delinquency in hopes of averting criminal behavior before it starts. Research documents some success. The most famous study was of the Perry Preschool, in Ypsilanti, Michigan, which provided two years of enriched schooling and weekly home visits to small children from poor minority families. By the time the kids had turned 27, half as many had been arrested as a control group that did not benefit from the enriched classes.


Mark Moore, a professor of criminal justice policy and management at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, offers a more innovative and sophisticated idea. He recognizes the need for the transfer of some juvenile cases to adult courts if they show "unusual maturity, acted alone, or persisted in committing crimes."






Monday 30 April 2012

references used in my literature review

How Does the BP Oil Spill Impact Wildlife and Habitat? - National ...  
Text found: million gallons of oil that flooded into the Gulf after the explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig...and the nearly 2 million gallons of chemical dispersants used on the spill may not be known for years...and marine mammals were found injured or dead in the six months after the spill...Scientists will be watching fluctuations in wildlife populations for years to come...population dips and cascading food web effects may become evident in the years ahead...commercial fisheries brought in $659 million in shellfish and finfish in 2008
Url: http://www.nwf.org/Oil-Spill/Effects-on-Wildlife.aspx
Published: 2012-04-28 11:36 - 90/6/6/1 - From:Bing - Rank:16%

How Did The BP Oil Spill Effect The Enviroment? | Scienceray  
Text found: million gallons of oil that flooded into the Gulf after the explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig...and the nearly 2 million gallons of chemical dispersants used on the spill may not be known for years...and marine mammals were found injured or dead in the six months after the spill...Scientists will be watching fluctuations in wildlife populations for years to come...population dips and cascading food web effects may become evident in the years ahead...commercial fisheries brought in $659 million in shellfish and finfish in 2008
Url: http://scienceray.com/biology/marine-biology/how-did-the-bp-oil-spill-effect-the-enviroment/
Published: 2012-04-27 16:48 - 90/6/6/2 - From:Bing - Rank:15%

Deepwater Horizon oil spill - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  
Text found: the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill...BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill...the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week
Url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
Published: 2012-04-29 08:10 - 47/3/3/1 - From:Bing - Rank:7%

Deepwater Horizon oil spill in Encyclopedia  
Text found: the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill...BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill...the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week
Url: http://www.tutorgig.info/ed/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
Published: 2012-04-20 05:54 - 47/3/3/3 - From:Bing - Rank:6%

BP settles Gulf spill lawsuits for at least $7.8B - Worldnews.com  
Text found: the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill...BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill...the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week
Url: http://article.wn.com/view/2012/03/03/BP_settles_Gulf_spill_lawsuits_for_at_least_78B_v/
Published: 2012-03-07 20:47 - 47/3/3/6 - From:Bing - Rank:5%

BP Is Messing With the Wrong Woman - Worldnews.com  
Text found: the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill...BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill...the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week
Url: http://article.wn.com/view/2012/02/25/BP_Is_Messing_With_the_Wrong_Woman/
Published: 2012-04-01 14:22 - 47/3/3/7 - From:Bing - Rank:5%

Bp Oil Spill Workers Sick and Being Covered Up  
Text found: the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill...BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill...the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week
Url: http://wn.com/Bp_oil_spill_workers_sick_and_being_covered_up
Published: 2012-04-27 23:05 - 47/3/3/8 - From:Bing - Rank:5%

The negative effects of the disaster happened in Gulf of Mexico in 2010


The negative effects of the disaster happened in Gulf of Mexico in 2010


In 2010, unfortunately the world could see one of the biggest marine disasters happened in the history of petroleum industries. It happened in Gulf of Mexico, USA, by BP (Beyond Petroleum) industry. The oil spill flowed for about three months. The explosion killed eleven men and injured seventeen other people working on the platform. The spill of petroleum in that disaster not only caused the death of several men, but also caused a lot of damage in the marine and wildlife in that area. Furthermore, it caused problems to the gulf’s fishing and tourism industries. Scientists also reported immense underwater plumes of dissolved oil not visible at the surface as well as an 80-square-mile (210 km²) surrounding the well that was blown. Although on September 19, 2010, the relief well process was successfully completed, and the federal government of USA declared the well effectively dead, a research team found oil on the bottom of the seafloor in late February 2011 that did not degrade. On May 26, 2011, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality extended the state of emergency related to the oil spill. By July 9, 2011, roughly 491 miles (790 kilometers) of coastline in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida remained contaminated by BP oil, according to a NOAA spokesperson. In October 2011, a NOAA report stated that dolphins and whales continue to die at twice the normal rate.

In January 2011, the White House oil spill commission released its final report on the causes of the disaster. They blamed BP and its partners for making a series of cost-cutting decisions and the lack of a system to ensure well safety. After its own internal examination, BP admitted that it made mistakes which led to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. In June 2010, BP set up a $20 billion fund to compensate victims of the oil spill. To July 2011, the fund has paid $4.7 billion to 198,475 claimants. In all, the fund has nearly 1 million claims and continues to receive thousands of claims each week. However, the marine environment still has serious issues nowadays regarding to this disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, it rises the question of what precaution are still taken to minimize the negative effects of the disaster of golf Mexico in the marine environment?


 Before focusing attention on the disaster in gulf Mexico, it should be firstly clarified what is environmental pollution. According to Haluzan, Environmental pollution - Definition and meaning, 2009, a good definition of environmental pollution would be the introduction of different harmful pollutants into certain environment that make this environment unhealthy to live in. environmental pollution is happening in many parts of the world especially in form of air and water. The most severe environmental pollution is happening in developing countries of the third world since not only to they lack any form of sustainable management but they also lack of even the basic sanitation. Many developed countries have introduced certain laws to not only regulate various types of pollution but also the laws to mitigate the adverse effects of pollution.

As it was explained the meaning of environmental pollution and its causes above, it is now time to draw attention into the main subject that is the disaster in the Gulf Mexico. The Gulf of Mexico is an Ocean basin largely surrounded by the North American continent and the island of Cuba. According Resource Database for Gulf of Mexico Research, 2012, it is bounded on the on the northeast, north and northwest by the Gulf coast of United States, on the southwest and south by Mexico and on the southeast by Cuba. The shape of its basin is roughly oval and is approximately 810 nautical miles wide and filled with sedimentary rocks and debris. It is connected to the Atlantic Ocean through Florida straits between the U.S and Cuba and with the Caribbean Sea via the Yucatan channel between Mexico and Cuba. With this narrow connection to the Atlantic, the Gulf experiences very small tidal ranges. It is approximately 615,000 miles square and almost half of the basin is shallow continental shelf waters. The basin contains a volume of roughly 660 quadrillion gallons and it was formed approximately 300 million years ago as a result of plate tectonics. However, on April 20, 2010, the deep water horizon oil platform, situated in the Mississippi Canyon about 40 miles off the Louisiana coast, suffered a catastrophic explosion. It sank a day-and-a-half later. Resource Database for Gulf of Mexico Research claims that although initial reports indicated that relatively little oil had leaked, by April, 24, it was claimed that approximately 1,000 barrels of oil per day were issuing from the wellhead, about 1 mile below the surface on the ocean floor. Moreover, it stated that on April 29, the U.S government revealed that approximately 5,000 barrels per day, five times the original estimate were pouring into the gulf from the wellhead. The resulting oil slick quickly expanded to cover hundreds of square miles of ocean surface, posing a serious threat to marine life.

BP admitted its involvement on the deepwater horizon missed key warning signs in the hours before the explosion aboard the oil rig, but an internal investigation pit much of the blame on other companies involved in the well according to Goldenberg, 2010.
BP was accused of attempting to pass on the blame for its conclusion that Transocean, the rig owner and Halliburton, which carried out cement work, shared mush of the responsibility. As Goldenberg stated, Mark Bly, the oil company’s head of safety and the leader of the investigation, admitted that BP onsite managers could have prevented the catastrophe had they picked up warning signs of a breach of the cement seal at the bottom of the well, as well as unusual pressure test readings, only moments before the explosion. He told to reporters in Washington that given everything that came before, there probably should have more risk assessment and they probably should have been more careful. Therefore, because of this lack of irresponsibility from the men working in the platform in that day, many people died and the marine environment became polluted.

The National wildlife federation, 1996-2012, mentioned that scientists are still assessing the effects of the estimated 170 million gallons of oil that flooded into the Gulf after the explosion of BP's Deepwater Horizon oil rig. They found that more than 8,000 birds, sea turtles, and marine mammals were found injured or dead in the six months after the spill. They also stated that the long-term damage caused by the oil and the nearly 2 million gallons of chemical dispersants used on the spill may not be known for years.
They point out about the immediate and long term impacts because of the disaster. According to the National wildlife federation, in the following months the Gulf oil disaster occurred, wildlife managers, rescue crews, scientists and researchers pointed many immediate impacts of the oil impacting wildlife such as oil coated birds' feathers , causing birds to lose their buoyancy and the ability to regulate body temperature, mammals could have ingested oil , which causes ulcers and internal bleeding, sea turtles were covered in oil and dead and dying deep sea corals were discovered seven miles from the Deepwater Horizon well. Scientists also claim that although oil is no longer readily visible on the surface, it is not fully gone.  They have found significant amounts on the Gulf floor, and the oil that has already washed into wetlands and beaches will likely persist for years, that mean the long term impacts of this disaster. They are: Unbalanced Food Web, which the Gulf oil disaster hit at the peak breeding season for many species of fish and wildlife. The oil’s toxicity may have hit egg and larval organisms immediately, diminishing or even wiping out those age classes. Without these generations, population dips and cascading food web effects may become evident in the years ahead. Another impact is the decreased Fish and Wildlife Populations. Scientists will be watching fluctuations in wildlife populations for years to come. One more impact is the decline in Recreation. The Gulf Coast states rely heavily on commercial fishing and outdoor recreation to sustain their local economies. According to NOAA, commercial fisheries brought in $659 million in shellfish and finfish in 2008, and just over 3 million people took recreational fishing trips in the Gulf that year.

As it can be seen this disaster caused a lot of damage not only in marine environment but also in our lives. The local economy in that area decreased because the area was contaminated, no fish around that area and the wildlife became very poor. However, many companies tried to help and solve that problem by using various techniques. According to Toscano and Bukszpan, 2010,they wrote about several ways to clean up the Gulf oil spill such as Surface Dispersants, that  are sprayed by boats, aircraft and workers on the shore. They pull apart oil particles suspended in water, reducing the oil slick to droplets that can be degraded by naturally occurring bacteria; Controlled Burns, where a fireproof boom corrals leaked oil into smaller, denser pockets that can be ignited remotely from the air and burned off. The process of burning removes large portions of oil from the water's surface, keeping it away from the shoreline; Booms and Skimmers that are used to collect oil in concentrated areas, while skimmers separate the crude from the water. Therefore, it can be said that the oil industries are still working to clean up all the oil spilled in that area and make the used of these techniques to have a successful result.

To conclude, caring about the environment we live in is an important issue for every human. The disaster in Gulf of Mexico just showed how people are careless about it. Not only in the oil industries but also in other industries do not give enough attention to the environment and to the environment of other human beings. It is true that humans are imperfect beings. They commit mistakes, but when they are in presence of the responsibility of not putting the lives of other human beings in risk, they must be really careful and responsible.

In this paper, it is shown in detail what happened in Gulf of Mexico, when it happened and how it happened. It can be read that it was lack of responsibility from the people working in that day. Moreover, it shows the effects caused by this disaster and its consequences. Furthermore, it shows the techniques that are being used to reduce the effects caused in that area since it is not completely clean as some authors claim. Therefore, it can be said that, as humans, people should be more aware and care about the environment they live because as the National wildlife federation stated, a healthy environment is prerequisite of healthy life for people, and fighting pollution is definitely the best way to keep our environmental healthy.












Sunday 18 March 2012

"What precautions can be taken to minimize the negative effects that petroleum industry has on offshore environment?
Hi guys,as you can see my topic is related to environmental issues, more specifically on offshore. I'm interested in this topic because firstly I am a undergraduated student in petroleum engineering, secondly I am an ambientalist person( if I can say that). And as we know, petroleum industries cause a lot of damages and destructions in our environment and in the environment of other species. In this reseach paper, I will focus my attention on the precautions that can be taken to reduce the negative effects that the petroleum industries cause offshore, that means, in deep sea.